I did some reading on monotheism and traced it back to Akhenaten. As I reasoned my way through the possible logic of events I arrived at the following:
          Akhenaten uproots the old pantheon and builds a new city to honor his new god; - Akhenaten dies, the old pantheon is resurrected only to be toppled by Tutankhamen; - Tutankamen is killed and with him the god of Akhenaten; - the god goes underground and is memorialized by a few worshipers who, like the Christians later, keep the flame alive for the time intervening between Tutankamen and Ramses; - Moses comes in contact with the monotheists and the new god enters his mind; - later in Sinai that god, who has matured over the intervening centuries, gives Moses a moral and ethical creed that will give the Jews an ascendency over the other desert tribes.
          Would you please comment on this continuum.

Jon Horton, writer - jonhorton1@earthlink.net  -  (17.Nov.2002)

::  OvS's reply.    Prior to 300 BC, hardly no such thing as pure monotheism existed. Even in the Bible, Jahweh mentions himself being supreme to other gods. Already, prior to the time of the great pyramids, i.e. before 2,500 BC, the ancient Egyptians had only one creator god, and other gods were his offspring and "assistants".
           Akhenaton did recognize other gods also, but he attacked them in order to attack their priesthoods. He made Aten his chosen god to be supreme (but not "mono"), partly for political reasons.
           Moses lived almost 200 years earlier than Akhenaten (which fits Egyptological and archaeological indications, in contrary to any time later) and, thus, he could not be inspired by this religious king. Furthermore, in several parts their theologies differ very much.
            Finally, it was not about the Jews but the Israelites. The Jews were just one tribe among several. Together with the proselytes (from other nations and peoples), who were allowed to join the exodus, the result was this: Of the whole group, the Jews were only approx. 13 percent, according to concrete information by the countings listed in the Bible. And they arrived after having stayed in Egypt during four generations - i.e. no desert tribe culture, and also their legislation in many detail confirms this impression.
          OvS.

          Like so many others I have read your books on Moses with great pleasure and surprise - surprise as to your abilities to guide when necessary, if one needs an answer and does not only want to "shine" among "ruminants".

          I have especially liked these features:
          - your exciting reading written for me and everybody, served in a way so that everything goes down voluntarily, if only the eyes and the fingers can keep the pace,
          - that you weave in the sources in the text in an easily readable way - far better than a source summary. This was initially supportive of one's growing wish to recognize the fact that you are right in your hypotheses, and later of one's own conviction on these,
          - the information about Soeren Giversen's Danish translation of "Corpus Hermeticum", which was a gift in a gift to me - at the beginning of this year I received volume 4 as a birthday present, and now I have read both volume 2 and 3, as well as the "C - H".

H. Asbjørn Christensen, DK-8220 Brabrand,  -  (11.Jul.2004)

::   OvS's reply.     I am happy to learn that the mentioned features of the inner form of the books have actually worked, and are being appreciated. Intentionally, much care has been put into the planning of the mentioned conditions in order to make it easier for the reader to comprehend the extensive amount of material.
          Long ago now - from the beginning - I was therefore experimenting and discovered that no ideal solutions could be found here, but that in the circumstances the best possible way was to present the sources together with the subject dealt with. This because simultaneously I realised that many would find the necessary information about the sources as a both interesting and time-informative material.
          Because it was also necessary several times to refer to certain source data, I often found it appropriate to repeat much of the information in a said situation, in order for the reader to confer during the current reading. In this way the readers could avoid stopping the progress in order to look up information in a base or at a previous reference site.

          After having read the book-series, one reader, a student of mathematics using study books from British as well as American universities, expressed her pleasure with the - mentioned - method by which my books are structured. In this connection I was able to compare - those many years after my own considerations.
          She had noted the fact, that the British university books often were only half the size of the Americans of the same kind. And that from an actually obsolete and more stringent teaching tradition, the British books had only very brief references to sources, which in general should be sought out from other works. This even often means implicit references, because the knowledge of the student was already taken for granted.
          Whereas often the American university books just in a more educational way generally use the method, which - by following another way - I have previously found the most logical among several possibilities. Afterwards it is no problem, when everybody can see what ought to have been obvious from the beginning.

OvS.

I am very interested in your publications on Moses. - I have translated the first 4 chapters of Genesis from the Hebrew, letter by letter rather than assuming word divisions that may or may not have been there. The result is so concise and beautiful that it identifies its author as being a genius of the highest order.
          Was that person the one known as Moses? and where did he get his letters? Or was that manuscript a much older text? Do your publications address these question? If so then I would like to purchase the pertinant volumn and find someone to help me translate it. Right now I need to gleen from them what is relevant to the current stage of my work.

Dianna Padgett, - www.geocities.com/dianna217.geo/transframe.htm  -  (23.Oct.2002)

::   Ove von Spaeth:  - (28.Oct.2002)  - Besides his own contributions, Moses also used much older information. And he seems to have been involved in the invention of the letters of the alphabet - according to several writers of antiquity and even the ancient Fathers of Church.
          In vol. 5 of my book-series, three chapters investigate this. Publishing my books on Moses in English needs a capable publisher (or sponsor). - The books analyse that Moses' contribution to the invention of the first real alphabet is most plausible. In some parts he may have been inspired by earlier attempts.
          The ancient rabbinical writings inform us that the first time when Moses escaped to Sinai, Jethro managed to hide him in shafts in the mountains - out of sight from pharaoh's soldiers searching for him. Today we know that the world's oldest alphabet is found (1905, by archaeologist Flinders Petrie) written on the walls of hidden mineshafts in the Sinai mountains, and has now been dated to around 1500 BC. It is precisely the time of Moses (according to our research and based on data also from ancient astronomical sources). The Bible (Torah: the five books of Moses) is the first and oldest book in the world using the alphabet.
-
::  Dianna Padgett:  - (30.Oct.2002) - In return for the leads you have given me I'll append a few verses of the translation I've done. It's not a narrative but more of a formula. It sounds like you discribes it very precisely. I assigned words to patterns of letters that repeated so by the 4th chapter it gets almost poetic. I'm going to have a chapter on Moses, the Egyptian connotations, Qabalistic connotations and maybe the mathematical connotations.
-
::  OvS.:  - (3.Nov.2002) - Concerning the Genesis' prime factors for the Creation, my article in "Swedano Journal" may be of some interest - use the link: Pattern, Universe, and Ancient Knowledge. - Your translation demonstrates, again that there are different layers (or codes) in the texts of Moses. The old rabbis mentioned 4 levels. In my research I have met at least 3 more.
-
::  Dianna P.:  - (5.Nov.2002) - Your article is very interesting and extremely  relevant to what Moses was saying in the 4 chapters I translated. In that the process of the Original Source reproducing it's self on the 'manifested' level is to first form a space of receptivity which has a particular pattern. This space of receptive Will is immediately filled with 'neutral' Will creating both the Primum Mobil and another empty space of receptive will reflecting the pattern of the original receptive space. So the first trinity is Will, Receptivity(pattern) and Movement. And all manifestation is the interaction of these three.
          I'm reading a book by Friedman (Richard Elliott Friedman in his ‘Who Wrote the Bible?' Harper, SanFrancisco 1989) which postulates that the books of Moses were written by several people at a later time. The first chapter was supposedly written by a Priest or a group of Priests. That chapter is too precise and concise to have been written by a committee. But there may be clues yet in it that I can use.
          The first verse of chapter one has both the square root of 2 and Pi  defined in it. The second verse contains the Golden Mean. I feel that this was handed down by a person of extremely high intelligence.
-
::  Dianna P.:  - (11.Nov.2002) - I started out interpreting each letter individually. When 2 or more letters repeat in a sequence then I give this 'formula' a name. For instance Beth, Resh, Aleph  begins the first verse, when this sequence repeats later in the verse it is given the name 'create'.
          It's like the formula of H2O being called water for convience and clarity. There are a number of words that end up being the same as in the regular translation but there are many that are not. I found that Adam usually had a Heh in front of it so there is both Adam and H'Adam.  Adam was designated "distinct assimilation" and H'Adam  "determined assimilation". So the addition of the Heh added the Will to Choose. The idea that Vau is translated "and" and Heh translated "the" is ludicrius to me. They're parts of the Tetragrammaton. They are letters of importance, of value, not fillers.
         Pi  is inherant in the letters in Elohim (the Creator Gods), whose letters first appear in that order in the first verse. - Go to http://www.geocities.com/dianna217.geo/transframe.htm to see the translation.
-
::  Dianna P.:  - (17.Nov.2002) - I thank you very much for your help. The chapters of your first book on your website were so very important to my work.
          I will order your books. It's good to read some logical reasoning behind the often counterdictory stories of Moses. It's also good for me in particular to have Moses (and his writings) placed farther back in time than normally supposed.
-
::  OvS.:  - (18.Nov.2002) - Concerning the Sinai alphabet, nearly one scholar, the German Hebrew-expert Hubert Grimme, dare to (slightly) mention Moses - and received a lot of harsh attacks from colleages for the rest of his life.
          But nobody saw the logical facts: That Moses stayed at that place where this first alphabet is found. And that he was highly educated, so he could take some particular hieroglyphs and turn them into a simple and flexible connecting system of signs representing mono-sound-syllables only (instead of the hitherto known symbols of objects/meaning or signs most often covering more than one syllable). - It is not at all probable that anybody would create a writing-system to be used by a people already possessing one. Only the new nation, the Israelites, had no writing system of their own.
          In short, Moses combined some chosen Egyptian  glyphs, a very reduced number of them, and gave them (new) sound-values to be used for a proto-Semitic language but usable even for other languages as well. That was a new thing too.
          (In addition:) The particular sequence of the alphabetical letters - a, b, etc. - seems to have connections too, in writing systems of Babylonia, but depends originaly also on a frequency system (like e.g. a tone scale's octave or other dimensioned scales). This would exactly fit the widespred ancient tradition of using certain sound patterns in magical formulae and incantations (lots of papyus-texts concerning this, have been found) and for intonating religious ceremonials. In short, out of "international" ancient knowledge and special tradition behind the concept of writing Moses made a synthesis and developed it to an advanced stage.
-
::  Dianna P.:  - (25.Nov.2002) - It took me a long time to acclimate to Moses' "way of thinking" and presenting it in modern "way of thinking" is a little difficult.
          I'm looking for proof that Moses utilized a highly sophistocated alphabet already in existance; one that may have linked to the more advanced civilization that had the technology to build the pyramids and mayan temples etc. and had a knowledge of math that would verify the formulas I'm finding the translation. What did the letters look  like? When did the present style of Hebraic lettering come into being? Surely there is some answer that has not been tainted by the modern mindset. It's all well and good that I have an esoteric/alchemical translation of Moses' work but it is useless unless I can present a viable theory on that was Moses' intention. You have been so much help to me so far.
-
::  OvS.:  - (9.March.2003) - You have stated earlier that if you had begun your research on Moses before you attempted the translation of Genesis, you probably would not have completed... - And I too, would hardly have begun the research on Moses, if I then had been overwhelmed with the wide-spread modern academic-theological views on Moses and the Bible as artificial created history. The case is that biblical research appeared as a theoretical study into ancient languages and literature mostly around 1840, i.e. long before (c. 60 years) scientific archaeology had been developed. Meantime a weird hypothesis of Moses and the Israelites being a myth was founded, cultivated, and developed. And later the relevant archaeology often had to fit in and be adjusted - and not the other way around.
          The Moses' part of history was now remade - to be a myth - from the academic's school-desks and not from archaeological artefacts. In some cases more reliable methods of dating these ancient items appeared too late on the stage. Instead, hypothesis after hypothesis have been piled up - and historical knowledge about this whole construction being artificial has been forgotten by many among the later generations of scholars. They are, thus, being convinced that this unfounded and undocumented myth-theory represents "the very reality".

POSTSCRIPT by OvS.
Concerning Dianna Padgett's message of 5.Nov.2002 on a description of the creation factors as a particular text integrated in the First Book of Moses: Especially the trinity of Will, Receptivity(pattern) and Movement - and all manfestations being the interaction of these three. Also in Ancient India such a knowledge, here connecting to the Vedas/Vedanta, was handed down through the ages - a systematized cosmology, Sâmkhya.
          The Sâmkhya philosophy system was compiled on basis of much older sources by the sage Kapila, more than 3000 years ago. One of its particular branches being formed as an ultimate system, the "Yoga Sutras", was written down in Sanskrit text by Pantañjali 2.300 years ago. In some of the stanzas in Yoga Sutras, e.g. 2.18, appears the trinity in question, named trigunas, the three gunas, literally the three 'fibres' (cf. too, connections to the modern concept: the superstring theory). Three-gunas as the constituents of the Universe, primal factors close to the primal cause, perform their interaction as a dynamic balance. The eternal "non-resting", keeping the universe going.
          - The Trigunas are named in Sanskrit as sattva, rajas and tamas - i.e. illumination (intelligence-intensified light), activity, and inertia (established patterns, matter). Each in turn tends to dominate. This being constantly neutralised by the two other factors continuing the dynamic balance, upholding eternal universal activity. (This Trinity can be recognized in numerous universal transpositions e.g. as "start,-change,-stop"-principle, or "affinity,-exchange,-reality"-principle, etc.).
          Albert Schweitzer, Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Theology (and especially known as a Doctor of Medicine and Doctor of Music) acknowledged the exceptionel greatness of this system of Ancient India: "... a magnificiant achievement. Rarely, concerning the human thought, has a theoretical problem been recognized so clearly - and solved with such a striking acuteness ...".
          (Cf. too, OvS's articles, by links: "Pattern, Universe, and Ancient Knowledge" and "The Knights Templar's Knowledge from Egypt - and Moses". It may seem like that one of the historical impulses of reviving ancient spiritual knowledge had struck Middle-east civilizations, especially in India and Egypt, simultaniously at the time of Moses.

OvS.

(ed.note:  Dianna Padgett is the author of the book: "V I AMR, Becoming Manifest Transformation . A Qabalistic and Egyptian Analysis of the Formula of Creation as Found in Genesis 1-4".   Tiamat Press  2003,   Denver, Colorado, www.geocities.com/dianna217.geo/home.htm )

I have noted that many publications (latest your review of one of Ulla Runchel's books) say that for researchers of today it is a mystery how the ancient Egyptians produced stone vases with narrow necks completely hollowed out.
          A couple of years ago I happened to read the following article, which might shed some light on this mystery: http://www.geocities.com/unforbidden_geology/modren_stone_vases.html
          This has not much to do with Moses, but each little serious addition to our collected amount of knowledge is valuable. Now and again researchers get the idea to associate with craftsmen, often with excellent results.

Annie Lone Vedelsby, -  ALVedelsby@zmuc.ku.dk  -  (18.Aug.2004)

::   OvS's reply.    Much of the information to be found  frequently on the Internet is not always reliable, in particular so-called information from "informers" like the well-known acquaintances, H. Oax and F. Raud.
          Also in this case the contents of the web address pretend to solve the puzzle without really doing so - and make illusory, ill-founded references to four more professional sources.
          By inspection it is simply revealed that not one of the sources gets a bit closer to solving the problem. Most of these books do not at all mention the hollowing technique used for the hardest stone material or they just describe the technique as mysterious and by using hypotheses. Therefore, the superficial explanation and presentation on the mentioned web site as well as the reference can only rightfully be described as "pseudo research".
          Interested readers might wish to be informed about such problems, so we should emphasize that we are quite certain that also for the difficult tasks done in antiquity many very simple methods were used; - so simple that in our modern world they might often be very difficult to discover. This, because the way we think can so easily be influenced in our daily lives by the impact from today's far more complicated processes.
           For my own work during the many years of research, I have been forced to be extremely thorough and exact; - and in this way I have, not surprisingly, obtained a knowledge which sometimes exceeds the knowledge of certain experts in special areas. The fact that I have also thoroughly investigated the problems in question and thus do not simply pass on other researchers' statements, naturally, does not eliminate to grow wiser. Which is just what curretly takes place also in my own case.
          In any case research is always on the road, and some fine day the mysterious problems with the vases will be solved.
          And if only one of the four above mentioned sources had presented exact historic indications of ancient production methods of how to hollow out vases - however, possibly not alabaster vases or the like, alabaster being a rather soft stone, but a production using the world's hardest kinds of stone/rock - such a source or book would have been world famous long ago. In any case it is important all the time to keep in mind new possibilities for solutions. Thank you for your interest.

Ove von Spaeth, - www. moses-egypt.net  -  (21.Aug.2004)

On commenting the Jens Joergensen's review of Ove von Spaeth's book, "Prophet an Unknown Genius" - in the Internet newspaper Flix.dk of 3rd May 2006:
http://flix.dk/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3553

This review is very, very good - and says quite a lot about Ove von Spaeth's talented authorship. This should lead to the sale of a great amount of books. To my knowledge the Reviewer, Jens Joergensen, is the same scholar who has written some special books about H.C. Andersen; also these were informative and very well written.
          Now, when quite a number of books and media articles are internationally celebrating the 150th anniversary of Sigmund Freud - and are also mentioning that Freud wrote several articles about Moses - it is interesting that Ove von Spaeth's book in question presents a long list of works, in which other researchers are seriously occupied with Freud's interest in the still so important Moses.

Hans Baron Anckarstjerna, Historian, Journalist - sent to the Netavisen Flix.dk cf:
http://flix.dk/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3553  - 16:42  (8.May,2006)

(NOTE, See other comments)

Regarding Hans Baron Anckarstjerna's comments, 8th May, 2006 (to Jens Joergensen's review of 3rd May, 2006, on Ove von Spaeth's book, "Prophet and Unknown Genius") - in the Internet newspaper Flix.dk:  http://flix.dk/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3553

As a matter of current interest Freud is being mentioned in the Hans Baron Anckarstjerna's comment (8th May 2006). Freud's medical training and his strong interest in biology and especially in neurology became his approach to research on consciousness. However, Freud and his fellow researchers also included psychology and anthropology; Freud for instance was extremely well informed about Egyptology, and he owned a very fine collection of Ushapti figures ('after-death-servants', accessories in Egyptian graves) - and his influence on culture science was indisputable.

          At present by the anniversary, almost 2,000 books about Freud are available according to various Internet book-sites (Amazon, etc) - and he is being celebrated in the Newsweek, Time Magazine, Der Spiegel, and Die Zeit. Lately "Der Mann Moses und die monotheistische Religion", which Freud finished in London shortly before he passed away in 1939, has inspired many new publications. Freud has also written about his incredible occupation of Michelangelo's Moses, the famous statute in the Vatican.

          As their starting point or inspiration to work, Jan Assmann, the German Egyptologist and Culture Researcher, Edward W. Said, the Palestinian-American Literature Researcher, and Richard J. Bernstein, the American Philosopher, take up Freud's religious-critical considerations about the part of Moses in our perception of today's monotheistic religions. So also Moses is of current interest, although he was never out of focus (e.g. Cecil B. DeMille, the great Hollywood Director, succeeded in making the great movie, "The Ten Commandments", twice in his lifetime - in 1923 and 1956). Not so long ago Karen Armstrong has also dealt several times with Moses. Altogether - in the bibliography in my book-series on Moses can be found almost all of the latest 120 years' internationally published works and treatises about Moses - about 1,000 titles.

          Chapter 8 of "The Suppressed Record", the first volume of my book-series on Moses, describes the shared considerations of Freud and his fellow researchers: they do not conceal that Moses was an Egyptian prince - as appears from the comprehensive and clarifying source material in my books about the background of Moses. As already mentioned, Freud's perception of Moses has been referred to in the many works and articles by many different researchers, mentioned in the bibliography of the books. This creates a distance - in all what became of Moses?

          Mr. Victor Andreasen, the gifted and shrewd Writer and former Editor-in-Chief at the Ekstra-Bladet (leading Danish daily tabloid) - and known for his knowledge and great interest in history - was very enthusiastic about the first volume of the series. The positive and yet not entirely surrendering description of Freud's sometimes less historically consistent interpretation of Moses, made Victor Andreasen stop a completion of his review. He sent a private, 16-page letter about the book and the problem. I understood that I had entered a dangerous minefield by not being sufficiently conscious of the fact that by certain circles Freud, the Atheist, was almost cultic worshipped like a god - nothing was allowed to be said here, if it could be interpreted as the slightest disapproval.

          Many years ago when I began my research on the historical Moses, I only knew very little about Freud's ideas about Moses - however, through my own investigations also I ended up with some of the same results as by Freud. Even about the title of my book-series, "Assassinating Moses", it was to be observed that already Freud had used the similar expression, although not for quite the same purpose (Here, Freud had his theory about an archaic murdering-of-the-father). Based on the knowledge of that time, Freud arrived to his interesting conclusions about Moses. Freud was very logical and penetrating in his argumentation - in particular in his endeavours to present Moses as an Egyptian prince. More than 60 years later I was able to make use of many more sources from many more research areas (not least the first more precise Moses dating by which I even used means of astronomy) - this alone may lead to decisive difference and the further progress.

          Like Freud himself said, "It is a misunderstanding that science is only decisive, provable findings, and it is unfair to demand it to be so. This is a demand only expressed by those who pursue some kind of authority and a demand for having the religion's catechism replaced by something else, even with a scientific one. Science ... is constituted mainly by statements which is has developed into different degrees of probability".

Ove von Spaeth, Researcher and Writer (www.moses-egypt.net) - sent to the Internet-newspaper Netavisen Flix.dk, cf
http://flix.dk/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3553  -  14:28  (10.May,2006)

Link for more reading:  OvS's article on Freud and Moses

By  OVE VON SPAETH

New discoveries with interesting finds concerning the enigma of Moses are re-establishing important historical coherence - being now presented in the book-series 'Assassinating Moses'. In these books a unique historic material is vitalising the both fantastic and dramatic background for Moses in Egypt. Moses belongs to the most well-informed and spiritual personalities of our early history.


The vast amount of new, exciting information about the fate and mystery of Moses were found after thorough investigations lasting many years. The great uncovering was executed by tracking down the many, often repressed sources and relate them to the recent conquests of research.

          Since the publication of the first book of the five volume-series many inquiries have been received as to the creation of the books and the procedures used by the writer. The present article will inform about relevant features of a sequence of events lasting several years, with special detours and important milestones - a personal introduction to the writer's reasons for being occupied with the subject, and about the objective of the unusual project.


The Eternal Question

The fact that Cosmos, the huge space with stars and planets and the sun, our eternal vigorous source, is of so decisive importance for each of us as individuals, irrespective of our different ways of living, - is being valid also if we live in places where the sky can rarely be seen, and even whether we are conscious at all of the existence of these circumstances. These celestial conditions have become so natural to us that they are often receding into the background now for the benefit of things of more relevance usually occupying our attention.

          Much from all this I realised at a rather early stage, but the space with its oceans of stars remained more often in my consciousness than the daily events of the neighbourhood. I started to read about other peoples' understanding of these conditions through times and also about our historical relations to astronomy and the influence of this on our religions and the ways of thinking. In other words, the mystery of existence in a cosmic perspective relating to our ways of beliefs in western religions - would it be possible to combine these elements at all?

          "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" - the biblical Commandment so well known, is by many people related to the learning of Jesus. But Jesus was quoting Moses! (from Leviticus 19;18). This very commandment has been considerably influential through times. So, who was this Moses, who lived almost 1,500 years prior to Jesus?
          Moses was the earliest known historical person who initiated a religion. A religion which became a deep inspiration to the three main religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. And simultaneously a religion which for posterity based itself in its own special book, the Bible, the world's most wide-spread and read book, the oldest parts of which especially Moses has written, according to the tradition.

          In several parts of the Bible can be found a number of serene rules of conduct and ethical claims, but also - according to modern times concepts - robust and cruel features. How can this be compatible - did the same person write both parts?
          And almost 3,500 years after the works of Moses - how could it be meaningful at the present that some groups are trying to live according to the most severe, literal "understanding" of these texts? Especially when such disputed ways of understanding also can be experienced so destructively used in connection with huge, political and ethnic-religious problems of our era?
Since then and along the way - could something have happened to the texts late after they were created? Many questions like these had been "aroused" in me, when I, independently, started a number of special studies.


The World's Oldest Star Map

Through my early founded interest on history and astronomy - many years before my first book on Moses was published - I got acquainted with the world's oldest star map. It is a beautifully made, ancient Egyptian survey of the sky designed in a special form, much different from our way of doing these things. The map was made by the most gifted person of that time, Senmut (or Senenmut), minister-in-office of Queen Hatshepsut. After having studied, independently, several subject lines like history, religion-traditions, astronomy, old star lore, the myths of Antiquity, etc, I gradually realised, that this star map dates from the epoch specific of Moses. The map proved to describe a certain constellation in the sky in 1534 BC.
          The relation was supported, furthermore, by indications from the historians of Antiquity concerning the chronology connecting to Moses. However, by closer investigating the historical events of Moses, I soon discovered that within existing research there is a lot of internal confusion about this important figure.

          Without having been first introduced to theological hypotheses about Moses - capable of drawing investigations in a certain direction - I tried from the very beginning to maintain a broad view all around. But also without an idea about the extensiveness of the subject, I worked methodically uncovering everything relevant, i.e. often rare material about Moses and chronology. This was to last for many years.

          It was during these investigations that the star map was dated. In July-August 2000 the result was published as a scientific treatise in the "Centaurus International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science, and Astronomy" (Vol. 42). Prior to this I was fortunate enough to have my discoveries about the historical Moses accepted by C.A. Reitzel Publishers, Copenhagen, a tradition-ridden publishing house for the universities, and I was also comfortable with the fact that this was the original publishing house of Soeren Kierkegaard and H.C. Andersen.
          The huge material turned into becoming the book-series, "Assassinating Moses"; and here in the second volume an edition of the star map treatise was included. Also, I had the pleasure of being a referee/reviewer with the "Isis Journal of the History of Science", the world's biggest and oldest international science-history magazine.
          During these long-lasting studies the enormous Moses bibliography was established (also reproduced in the books). And it was encouraging too that for instance the Jewish National and University Library in Jerusalem had started to buy this (Danish) series of books.


Bound To the Mysterious Traces of Moses

Without realising it from the beginning I had started a completely new project only by originally wanting to write a by-line to a picture of the star map. All of a sudden the text took up one whole page. And very soon also a complete article. Based on many years of intensive work with the relevant historic and spiritual subjects, it proved that actually I knew a lot, which I had not realised at that time. This knowledge and connection were within me, but at a kind of stage like the toy of a transparent glass ball with shakeable snowfall. Where was I to start and to end?

          The fortunate decoding of a certain date of the star map proved to be the very first exact dating of this map. When this also appeared to be a tool in determining the time of Moses, all the pieces found their right place. The positive consequence of this was that here - exactly on the right track - the material itself could easily show the way. Now the text became a complete book.

          And quickly two books. Soon also three. Extending gradually even to five books - at one point, even six - so I disciplined myself very much to getting this truly incredible and lively material into a more limited scale - preferably without loosing anything. The entire work took almost twenty years, besides some years of preliminary studies which were then crystallizing.

          One fine day I discovered that in reality I was on a mission. Like in the old days when captains were sent out on dangerous and strange expeditions with sealed orders to be disclosed at the open sea only, i.e. after a long time without landfall, and being unable to reach land for instance by fleeting using a row boat. No escape possibilities. The way out is the way through - and here thus to bring back the existence of Moses into the consciousness of history.

          Very many essential circumstances of the antiquity becoming of importance even in our culture today stem from Moses and his time. To incorporate innumerable pieces of the wide-spread material of sources appeared to be an incredibly hard and lengthy work. Being so immensely fascinated, and despite of all the external problems and an even tough, hostile opposition, and also deep personal privations, I discovered to be simply bound to do this, no matter what.

          Working with this huge writing the strangest things happened - several peculiar inconveniences got in the way together with strange and positive events. For instance - often "in the last minute" - I had inestimable help from experts in Egyptology, Hebrew, Ancient Greek, etc. This was often only shortly prior to the passing away of several of these personalities after long lives of research and experience. Also in the fortunate period prior to the rebuilding of the Royal Danish National Library, I was able to use its old and immensely abundant reference library, a most paradisiacal reading room which, furthermore, for a long time was in reality the only open inter-disciplinary forum (now expired) in Denmark.
          For several years at that place - and also from foreign libraries - I borrowed and copied more than a thousand very important books, which had been out of print for a long time, besides articles and documents, exactly those I should use, until the introduction of taxes or fees - all straining for independent researchers - on foreign book lending and copies. And later even normal help from specialist librarians closed down together with other specialist library services (thus for instance hampering source-searching concerning old works not registered electronically) - in reality it would have made it nearly impossible to continue the unusual extent of research which was being conditioned by the creation of the book-series on Moses.


Facing the Wide-Spread Wrong Dating

How do we know that Moses is not a myth figure, and if the Exodus, when Moses and the Israelites left Egypt, did at all take place? Continuously - and from the very beginning of the work - such questions are being asked about the main subjects. Often this wondering proves to be influenced by the spread of several theological (and other) schools' doubts as to the existence of Moses as a historical person.

          The theological hypotheses concerned seem to stem from for instance the fact, that the research on Moses has often been done on the basis of a wrong dating placing him approx. 250 years too late in history - at around 1200 BC instead of at 1500-1400 BC. Consequently no traces have been found either of Moses or of the Israelite Exodus. On this inadequate basis it is often claimed today that the biblical Moses narrative is a nationalistic-romantic myth created by inventive priests approx. 2300 years ago in order to provide the Jews with a glorious pre-history.

          However, especially Egyptian and Jewish sources relating to Moses provide a considerable number of evident, historical traces. To a wide extent these have been ignored, often due to a rigid insistence on the much too late dating - and on the myth hypothesis, as mentioned, which reduce this the most important personality behind the origin of biblical culture and of the Jewish self-understanding to be only a fictional figure. This is not acceptable, because the allegation of Moses being a myth proves to be an impossible historical construction, likewise it already would be a complete absurdity for Jews of the past.

          It is an object of continued wondering why traditional, academic research does not to a wider degree use the latest 120 years' (forward to the new millennium) of numerous, although wide-spread, archaeological and textual references to events of the times of Moses.
          Already when the first volume of my Moses-series was published, some indignant university people started to use less polite measures. One lecturer became angry in particular because I quoted his attacks correctly and word by word. In the media some of his colleagues said: that they (quote:) "will fight with these books for many years". Many readers saw this as a compliment - i.e. that the books appeared with a certain class by "being able to have shaken the academic officials". But some from these groups found it to be desirable to categorise the discoveries like in books of adventurers and dreamers, which made other academics outside the research lines in question, and even without having read the books, to use the same designations.
          Yet our knowledge of the past is much more abundant and also more accessible than usually assumed. Ironically enough, so many data about what we call myths can be found at libraries and museums around the world collecting dust, almost without being known or studied.

          A considerable amount of the exactly in reality existing and relevant, historic sources about Moses is included in the books. Most of them for the first time related to modern archaeology and astronomical dating. The extremely considerable material about Moses makes it pointless to claim that he should be a mythical figure - on the contrary, historical and biblical information about Moses as an exact figure is emphasised thoroughly and substantially.


Exciting Findings Re-Considered

An unrealised problem is the fact that biblical text research started before archaeology was scientifically established. Along the way from the many seminal text discoveries, and soon more firm conclusions from mid-1800 and up till present (around year 2000) research, hypotheses appeared about the possible and non-possible relations of these findings - in attempts to understand the history behind the Bible.
          Thus, hypotheses were constructed especially about "Moses as a myth". And later in many cases, they had got established a huge, surrounding literary devise. Consequently, later generations are being confronted with a still up-generated system of comments' comments. In this way new students are often uncritically given the impression that the hypotheses are mostly to be considered the authoritative truth.

          Therefore, in the actual analysis work, which is the foundation of the Moses book-series, it was necessary for me in many cases to go all the way back to sources of previous generations of researchers. I did so in order to get the best possible direct knowledge (even also from excavation reports, for instance) about the findings as well as the way the results of research had been obtained. So instead of only taking for granted the later further extension, it was often decisive to have the very starting point analysed in relation to later findings and discoveries.
          The synthesis of material of the books - not seen previously to this extent in the Moses research - implied that this inter-disciplinary work would hardly have been produced without the help of many competent and interested researchers. Also other capable helpers deserve my sincere thanks.


Novels or Facts?

During times several researchers have had inquiries about delivering novel writing, - from their readers who would like to have a look into the exciting information, however, preferably via fiction as being the well functioning way of communicating. To some people source references are a pleasant confirmation of quality of information or an interesting extra information along the way - others, however, understandably, see this as too many traffic lights, hampering the reading velocity a little too often. Many scientists have used the novel version, when they wanted to launch or try out new ideas - all of which, for general reading, is a handy but also more responsibility-free communication.

          A project like this about a new understanding of the special background of Moses has not previously been carried out - and might easily be understood as less usable in practise as well as in serious consideration, if the discoveries presented had been described in such a way that they would be less accessible for control. Therefore - no novel, but some given subjects of the most important relevance and also being able to engaging by virtues of their own. By themselves they even contain further perspectives - which also concern new thinking which, in the not so long-term, will be necessary within the actual religions.


The Spiritual Dimension

In these books about the rediscovered background of Moses, the very history concept is in practise being extended to the effect that also a number of magical and spiritual conditions are mentioned equally with other historical events. The history of Moses and Egypt can not possibly be understood if these elements - when really belonging to history - are without being shown attention.
          Also on this background, the books therefore brings to light for instance the mystery plays of ancient Egypt, 'masonic'like rituals, magic, ritual healing, astrology, religious royal power. And for instance also inscriptions about the magic used by ancient kings and generals. In addition, oracles, divine conception, star knowledge mythology, and cosmology. Sublime impressions from a culture comprising penetrating spirit - thus having here found its expression in spiritual architecture and art, surpassing most of what is known from any known civilisation. When we meet it now, several thousand years later, it still affects us.

          In the books, among some of the information - also with new angles to mysteries and ancient initiations cultures - several readers have recognised masonic and similar groups' early-history circumstances. This is where these books have tried to pass on some fundamental, often forgotten features still bearing exact resemblance with historical events known from the world of Antiquity. Not least the Egyptian inspiration is supplementing and putting into perspective the subject and our understanding. And in this context the books are focussing on these spiritually founded conditions in the Egyptian past and from there bringing to light several, also general traces behind present culture and history.

          A reviewer expressed his understanding of the books like this, "Moses was born to become a pharaoh in what was at that time the mighty Egypt, and was initiated in the ancient, esoteric wisdom - and concerning intelligence he was by far surpassing his contemporaries. Obviously, he was a highly advanced soul meant to lead human beings one step further into evolution".
          On the Internet it is now possible to read more about some of the many discoveries and about their inspiring reception via the presentation in the books. And also about the critic necessary to all new research - together with an occasional, peculiar resistance - to put it mildly. Essential to a colourful beginning. See, for instance, information about the books on their own homepage, www.moses-egypt.net


The Repressed Information

The Bible, as well as the ancient Rabbinical Writings, and many of the ancient, learned writers mention that Moses was known as the Son of Pharaoh's Daughter. My book-series about the historical Moses was given the unusual title "Assassinating Moses" on the background that three times in history it was attempted to destroy Moses: - First, by the Egyptians, attacking him as their heir to the throne and already in his time removing his names and other memories about him, in order to make him non-existent. - Later, by the priestly editors of the Bible, such as Ezra in ca. 350 BC who reduced the Egyptian background and status of Moses. - And finally, many present theological schools reject the existence of Moses and designates him as an imaginary, mythical figure. Consequently, in some circles the books are considered strongly controversial, even heretic.

          By means of reconsidering the identity and background of Moses, his fate and mystery, the books are bringing to light the replaced and repressed historic existence of this personality of early history, who to us represents the great man straddling the dividing line between history and prehistory and who even created this line himself. By this context the first volume of the series - commencing publication in 1999 - was named "The Suppressed Record" (C.A. Reitzel Publisher and Bookseller, Ltd., Copenhagen). Each of the five books of the series is an independent volume and can be read individually.
 
          All of these books of my Moses-series represent a new-orientation also with perspectives for research so far done in these fields - now being on its way into transformation. And in our religious learning and comprehension for the present, a cosmological insight will have to be included again. Together with his advanced initiation and education in Egypt many indications show that Moses carrying with him religious 'secrets' at the Israelite's Exodus from Egypt. Apparently, now is the time for many of the exciting questions in this relation to be solved and several enigmas will face their solution.

Ove von Spaeth,  Writer, Historian, Independent Researcher
Copyright 2002 -  www.moses-egypt.net